Method TA : Forex
Japanese yen Atomic Chart Patterns
USDJPY : OVERLAYING FRACTALS
These 3 markers represent the most basic, constant, abundant, powerful pattern in charting.
I call it the Atom. Each Atom has 3 points. They're color coded. It's universal and the ratios are perfectly
matched on the Fib. The consistency makes it predictable.
Therefore exploitable.

Each of these share at least one common pivot point. The fractals overlap on the sharp side of the triangle.
This explains more than 90% of all chart movement, simply by virtue of the shape, how they fit together and the logical restrictions that follow.

If all price movement can be logically explained with a single shape, interlocking in opposing directions, repeating perfectly, infinitely..

I don't see how we fit into the picture..
And I don't accept that we're achieving this degree of perfection by accident, and we definitely couldn't do it intentionally.

11 Aug

USDJPY: SINGLE FRACTALS
Random individual atoms. Note how the markers aren't forced. This makes VISUAL sense.

11 Aug

USDJPY : Double Bottom
All double bottoms and tops have the same structure if you zoom into them. One sharp and one rounded side

11 Aug

INTEL Interlocking FRACTALS
This is closer to what we'd see in crypto. Bullish fractal, matched by an opposing and interlocking bearish fractal. Like crocodile teeth

11 Aug

Japanese Yen : Predicted targets
USDJPY NEXT TARGET

11 Aug

USDJPY LOng term TARGET
Regardless of what Japan does, or what happens in the world for the next ~5 years. The Yen MUST touch this target before it can strengthen.

This is what I meant with the "implications" of my work. I've not found any deviation from this pattern. It's delayed sometimes, but but the destination will always be the same, pre-determined level. This one is predicted by the previous one, that one by the one before.
Zoom out to the 1yr cycle and you'll find that
all of the 1M and below conform perfectly to the rules.

IT NEVER DEVIATES.

There's only two possible explanations:
1] It's destiny and our behavior visibly sticking to
this simple set of rules, on all financial assets, stocks, crypto, etc. and this is somehow so perfectly in sync that even the relative
exchange rate of any two countries' national currencies are subject to our amazing synchronicity that also happens to be fractal and just randomly manages to repeat endlessly on all trading pairs, in all asset classes, across all exchanges, on all timescales, ALL THE TIME!

I'll be plain. That's fucking ridiculous.
But it is what conventional market theory says is true.

or

2] This is not a direct, proportional reflection of what's going on in the world and instead of being "caused" by global events, sentiment and all the other things people point to with more hope than conviction, it's simply not us that's causing it..
It does what it does because it has to in order to follow the simple set of rules I've identified. Price changes and we chase after it, believing it's because of us.

Besides the proof I've provided that supports the Red Pill mentioned in option 2, there's a simple way of making sense of it all.

If you've never met someone that wants BTC to only ever depreciate, then it's safe to assume that we all want the same thing: For it to go up. That's the very definition of sentiment. And because I know that you've never met that person, because they don't exist, it's difficult to accept that sentiment drives ANYTHING, because sentiment goes both ways and it seems that the bears are conspicuously absent.

If everybody wants it to go up, then why isn't it going up?
"Market efficiency" might have felt like an acceptable explanation for the trade of physical goods, but it's not anymore, and if any of you could bring yourselves to be completely honest and apply the same critical thinking you're capable of in every other aspect of your lives, then you'd have to agree that what you've been told is the truth, and taught are the facts, always have this blurry, vague quality to them.. There's never a case where you can confidently say "this caused that and here's why" and expect anyone to agree because it made intrinsic sense.

So I'm firmly in option 2.

11 Aug